Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Drivers
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Drivers, Price and Reviews– The 15-inch Asus ROG Zephyrus was one of the primary Max-Q gaming PCs we evaluated, focusing on the sweet spot among force and slimness utilizing tuned-down renditions of top of the line Nvidia illustrations processors (GPUs). Asus thinned it more with the Zephyrus S, and it is currently expanding that bundle in two major manners. The Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 (begins at $2,699.99; $3,299.99 as tried) is both a 17-inch-screen take on that plan and one of the primary PCs we’ve investigated with another Nvidia RTX “Turing” GPU. This new degree of force, matched with a greater screen, is divine. It’s not faultless, however: The base is somewhat feeble, the 17-inch impression commonly subverts movability, and the RTX execution is incredible, yet not endlessly better than past comparable “Pascal” GPUs. This is a high-caliber, amazing big-screen gamer, yet we give the edge to the MSI GS75 Stealth (audit coming soon) among dainty RTX PCs we’ve tried up until now, while the Alienware 17 R5 remains our general gaming Editors’ Choice.
Same Sleek Design, Bigger Package
In the event that you’ve looked at the 15-inch ROG Zephyrus previously, you’ll locate its bigger kin looks exceptionally natural. The look and style are uniform across the two, here extended across a greater surface zone.
The top highlights a similar split-design plan, while the console is pushed down to the close to edge to account for a punctured ventilation board on the forward portion of the deck. This additionally implies the touchpad is shunted off to one side of the console (and is, for certain, a piece smaller than you’re utilized to).
Both that and the console situating do take some becoming accustomed to, and I don’t think either is ideal. They’re functional, yet the touchpad could be roomier, and there’s nothing to lay your wrists on for composing. They’re not the most noticeably terrible concessions to make for the imperative cooling, which is done in help of getting such amazing parts into a particularly slim PC. That is in accordance with the Max-Q plan reasoning, which is enveloping an always bigger wedge of the market for premium gaming PCs.
Furthermore, meager the Zephyrus S GX701 is. The bigger screen doesn’t make it a lot thicker than the 15-inch model, yet it is significantly greater in general. It estimates 0.73 by 15.7 by 10.7 inches (HWD), which is minimal thicker and more profound however recognizably more extensive. It’s likewise considerably more cumbersome: The 15-inch model utilizes its slimness and size to enlist at 4.6 pounds, while the section like GX701 is heavy at 5.9 pounds.
The suspension is slender for a 17-inch gaming PC, presumably (take the Alienware 17 R5 at 1.18 by 16.7 by 13.1 inches and 9.77 pounds, for example), however it’s a long way from what I’d call versatile. The width and weight make it lopsided to hold and precarious to use on your lap or resting, in the manner in which you could with a more modest scratch pad. The MSI GS75 Stealth, additionally a 17-incher, is a full pound lighter and without a doubt, hardly thicker. To the Zephyrus’ credit, Gigabyte’s kindred RTX debutante, the Aero 15-Y9, is just a little more modest as a 15-inch PC at 0.74 by 14 by 9.8 inches, however its 4.4-pound weight is a recognizable distinction.
A Flimsy Flap, a Beautiful Screen
Adding to that is the base fold, a pillar of the Zephyrus plan. To manage the warmth created by the amazing GPUs that have went with this meager PC line since its commencement, Asus designed a base board that broadens and withdraws as you open and close the screen clamshell. This permits more ventilation through the base and out the sides, as the PC is excessively dainty for burly back or side vent blocks. In the picture beneath, it’s open.
The fold on the first Zephyrus was think—it was all in all too wobbly and bowed in at whatever point a lot of pressing factor was applied, particularly when you conveyed the PC with the screen open and held it or upheld it from the base. The more slender Zephyrus S highlighted a sturdier fold that fired further up the frame (which means, less space to flex) and was better supported.
Sadly, the base fold on the Zephyrus S GX701 motivates minimal certainty of the three. It’s planned in what feels like a similar path as the first, yet the additional weight and size of the 17-inch model appears a lot for the fold to support for long. It hasn’t broken on me, or seemed as though it was beginning to, however I actually flinch each time I get the PC with the screen open and the fold gives under my fingers, or I lay it on my knees and feel it clasp. The plastic twists right to base of the PC easily, clicking against it discernibly whenever squeezed rapidly. I’m certain it was intended for some flex, however the possibility of this monotonous activity over the long haul makes me dread for the little pivots down beneath.
The screen, then again, is a major champ. I adored the showcase on the 15-inch Zephyrus S, and Asus has basically gone and it made it bigger. This one estimates 17.3 inches askew, an IPS board with a full HD (1,920-by-1,080-pixel) local goal. That goal isn’t a lot to keep in touch with home about, and you may even wish it were higher at the cost. The presentation quality is incredible, however, and Asus has incorporated a 144Hz revive rate, uphold for Nvidia G-Sync, and a 3ms reaction time. As a bundle, it’s one of the spiffiest gaming-PC shows out there, and it seems like it’s improving your games as you play. The MSI GS75 Stealth’s screen has an essentially indistinguishable list of capabilities, lacking just G-Sync, however I think this one looks a bit better.
Configs and Connections
This PC comes in two U.S. SKUs, with our own being the upper (“GX701GX“) adaptation. This $3,299.99 model is pressed with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel’s Core i7-8750H processor, 24GB of memory, and a 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD. (This unit will likewise be accessible with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD.) A $2,699 GX701GW venture down incorporates a lesser CPU (a RTX 2070), yet is generally the equivalent.
The GX701 accompanies a couple of additional extravagant accessories. It includes a minuscule volume scroll wheel on the left-hand side, simply over the console, which is an abnormal and welcome consideration. At whatever point I’m utilizing a work area console with one of these, I miss it on some other console I change to. It’s ringed in LED gleam, which you can alter. The console can be changed in comparable design through the included Asus Aura alternatives packaged into the organization’s Armory Crate programming, which coordinates framework execution checking and control choices, too.
Naturally, the console plays out a cool wave impact when you turn the PC on, red lights running start to finish on a level plane across each key. The keys are exclusively illuminated, considering this impact and more through the product. More LEDs are found on the adjustable logo over the console, and the touchpad changes into a LED number cushion with the press of a catch. Additionally, there’s a committed Armory Crate key over the touchpad, which makes it simple to raise the product whenever.
At long last, the Zephyrus S GX701 incorporates a balanced port contribution. The left flank holds a USB 3.1 port, a USB Type-C port, and a HDMI yield, just as force connector and headset jacks. On the privilege are two USB 3.1 ports and another USB Type-C port. That ought to be a lot of choices for a mouse and drives, just as video-out help. On the off chance that you need DisplayPort, you need to experience a USB-C connector.
Testing Turing: RTX Brings the Heat
I gathered top notch of gaming workstations like the Zephyrus S GX701 to fill in as purposes of correlation for the benchmark tests. A portion of these offer similar segments and general size, while others fall in a similar value range. What’s more, some do both. You can see their names and parts in the graph underneath as a snappy reference
The Alienware 17 R5 addresses the most awesome aspect the big-screen Pascal PCs, while the MSI GS75 Stealth is the other RTX-put together machine we have with respect to the seat. The MSI GT75 Titan is a huge GTX 1080-based machine that can truly push the Zephyrus S GX701, while the 15-inch, GTX-prepared variant of the Zephyrus is a conspicuous correlation.
Efficiency and Storage Tests
PCMark 10 and 8 are all encompassing presentation suites created by the PC benchmark experts at UL (in the past Futuremark). The PCMark 10 test we run reproduces diverse certifiable profitability and substance creation work processes. We use it to survey generally framework execution for office-driven assignments, for example, word preparing, bookkeeping page maneuvering, web perusing, and videoconferencing. The test produces a restrictive numeric score.
PCMark 8, then, has a specific Storage test that we use to survey the speed of the PC’s stockpiling subsystem. This score is likewise restrictive to the test.
It’s implied that these luxury gaming PCs are generally rapid enough for regular errands—in the event that you can’t peruse the web and accomplish light office work effectively, you will not play high-constancy 3D games easily. Just the huge GT75 Titan was quicker on PCMark 10, and by a good edge, yet these outcomes are bunched intently enough that you shouldn’t promptly see a distinction in everyday use. The Zephryus S GX701’s drive is scarcely the fastest, however with these having SSDs, burden and boot times ought to be zippy no matter how you look at it.
Media Processing and Creation Tests
Maxon’s CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 test is completely strung to utilize all accessible processor centers and strings. Cinebench stresses the CPU as opposed to the GPU to deliver an intricate picture. The outcome is a restrictive score showing a PC’s reasonableness for processor-concentrated outstanding tasks at hand.
We time every activity and, toward the end, include the absolute execution time. The Photoshop test stresses CPU, stockpiling subsystem, and RAM, yet it can likewise exploit most GPUs to accelerate the way toward applying channels, so an amazing GPU may.
True Gaming Tests
The engineered tests above are useful for estimating general 3D inclination, yet it’s difficult to beat full retail computer games for making a decision about gaming execution. Long ways 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider are both present day, high-devotion titles with worked in benchmarks that show how a framework handles certifiable computer games at different settings. These are run on the greatest illustrations quality presets (Ultra for Far Cry 5, Very High for Rise of the Tomb Raider) at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K goals to decide the sweet spot of visuals and smooth execution for a given framework. Long ways 5 is DirectX 11-based, while Rise of the Tomb Raider can be turned to DX12, which we accomplish for this benchmark.
Our present testing techniques are still generally new, so we haven’t gathered enough information at this time for examination graphs. Running them on the Zephyrus S GX701, however, demonstrated a lot of guarantee. On Far Cry 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider at 1080p and most extreme settings, it arrived at the midpoint of 95fps and 104fps, separately. Those numbers are serenely over 60fps, and shouldn’t prompt any disturbing plunges while you play since there’s sufficient headroom. It’s not exactly enough to exploit the 144Hz presentation, yet you can at any rate show well more than 60fps regardless of whether it’s not hitting the invigorate roof, while less-requesting games than these will probably shoot up that high.
As I referenced over, the MSI GS75 Stealth performed better on these genuine game tests. The distinction in Far Cry 5 wasn’t as articulated (it found the middle value of 98fps), however it performed much better on Rise of the Tomb Raider (118fps). Our MSI test unit is more costly, however it stays away from the base board cooling required by the Zephyrus. The Zephyrus likewise incorporates a super mode in the Armory Crate programming, however it makes the fans sound like a stream is going to take off. (On ordinary mode, the fans are simply fairly boisterous.) Engaging it helped the casing rates exclusively by single digits, so it’s for the most part a bit much.
The 15-inch Zephyrus S’s Max-Q GTX 1070 is additionally an illustrative correlation. It makes the Max-Q RTX 2080 look great: The GTX-bearing Zephyrus S arrived at the midpoint of 79fps and 88fps on these tests. That is very distant this current framework’s numbers, despite the fact that they’re still easily over 60fps and can be ascribed to the hop in the two levels and ages. In the new Zephyrus, you’re paying for a jump in force that way, and you’re getting it. On the off chance that the Superposition numbers are any sign, however, it will not be as articulated versus a GTX 1080.
Battery Rundown Test
At last, we go to the battery life. After completely reviving the PC, we set up the machine in force save mode (rather than adjusted or superior mode) and make a couple of other battery-rationing changes in anticipation of our unplugged video overview test. (We likewise turn Wi-Fi off, placing the PC in Airplane mode.) In this test, we circle a video—a privately put away 1080p document of the Blender Foundation short Tears of Steel—with screen splendor set at 50% and volume at 100% until the framework conks out.
While the Zephryus S GX701’s battery life isn’t remarkable from a bigger perspective, it’s among the awesome this bunch, and an unexpected given the PC’s size and force. Five hours is a genuinely valuable measure of running time. The 15-inch form had me continually snatching my charger, so it’s ideal to make them inhale room should you bring it into the parlor or use it while voyaging.
Again however, the MSI GS75 Stealth one-increased the GX701, with a battery that kept going 6 hours and 18 minutes. Since it’s lighter, it’s additionally more hitting home with cart around and utilize away the charger.
Force Isn’t Always Perfect
The Zephyrus S GX701 is a muddled one. The presentation looks incredible, it has a lot of capacity, and it isn’t restrictively substantial on the off chance that you would like to carry it now and, at that point. Taken all in all, while I truly like the 15-inch variant of the Zephyrus S, I’m less persuaded about the structure factor and related concessions at this screen size.
On one hand, it’s meager and smooth looking, admirably more so than most 17-inchers. However, on different, its size and weight subvert the compactness. You can take it with you, however you may not have any desire to (or have the space for it) frequently. Also, it’s without a doubt amazing enough for more than-60fps gaming, however it doesn’t overwhelm the past age Pascal cards. On the off chance that you have a late-model GTX 1070 or GTX 1080 machine, you can likely save your desire for the most recent under tight restraints.
It is a knock up in force, however, and in case you will purchase a very good quality gaming PC in 2019, you should go for the most up to date innovation, which implies, to some extent, GeForce RTX. The Zephyrus S GX701 has its place, and it feels excellent separated from the base board, however the adjustable Alienware 17 R5 remains our top pick for top of the line gaming workstations, while the MSI GS75 Stealth is a prevalent GeForce RTX-based framework. In case you’re looking more compact, the Razer Blade 15 or the 15-inch rendition of the Zephyrus S are our top choices.
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Drivers
Support for:
- Windows 10 64 Bit
- Windows 8
- Windows 8.1 64 Bit
- Windows 7
- Windows Vista
- Windows XP
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 TouchPad Drivers for Windows 10 64 bit
|
Download
|
Description
|
|
ASUS Precision Touchpad
|
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 LAN Drivers for Windows 10 64 bit
|
Download
|
Description
|
|
Realtek LAN Driver
|
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Wirelles Drivers for Windows 10 64 bit
|
Download
|
Description
|
|
Intel Wireless Lan Driver and Application
|
|
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 BlueTooth Drivers for Windows 10 64 bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Chipset Drivers for Windows 10 64 bit
|
Download
|
Description
|
|
Intel INF Update Driver
|